Writ petition of 2006 dismissed as infructuous; no appearance for the petitioner, and the court held the petitioner had lost interest in pursuing the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:22681
Court No. - 28
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4378 of 2006
Petitioner :- Sushil Kumar Srivastava
Respondent :- Harijan Evam Nirbal Varg Avas Nigam Ltd.Thru M.D.And Anor
Counsel for Petitioner :- Rishi Raj
Counsel for Respondent :- Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary,Naresh Chandra Mehrotra
Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J.
(Brij Raj Singh, J.)
Order Date :- 22.4.2025 Rao/-
Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Sushil Kumar Srivastava
Harijan Evam Nirbal Varg Avas Nigam Ltd. Thru M.D.
Brij Raj Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
