A Consolidation Lekhpal challenged his transfer and sought relocation. The Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the respondent authority to consider the petitioner's representation strictly in accordance with law within two months.
Directed respondent to consider representation within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 17718 of 2025
Rashmi Devi Mishra
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 6 Others
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Arvind Kumar Tiwari .....Respondent(s) |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : C.S.C. |
Court No. - 34
HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.
November 25, 2025
N.S.Rathour
(Vikas Budhwar,J.)
Digitally signed by :- NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking transfer should be disposed of by directing the respondent authority to consider the representation in accordance with law?
Rashmi Devi Mishra
State Of U.P. And 6 Others
Vikas Budhwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
