Writ petitioners approached this court challenging notices issued by District Judge Ballia requiring them to show cause why recovery should not be made, alleging excess payments. The court observed that since the notices provided an opportunity to object, the petition stands disposed of without interim relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 17695 of 2025
Mahendra Kumar Yadav And 9 Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Gaurav Kumar, |
Vibhor Arora .....Respondent(s) |
|---|---|---|
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : Ashish Mishra, |
C.S.C. |
Court No. - 34
HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.
WRIA No. 17695 of 2025
2
same shall be considered strictly in accordance with law.
November 25, 2025
N.S.Rathour
(Vikas Budhwar,J.)
Digitally signed by :- NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahendra Kumar Yadav And 9 Others
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Vikas Budhwar
N.S. Rathour
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
