Allowed¶¶29

Poonam Yadav and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Medical and Health Lko. and 2 Others

Service law – pay parity

Allahabad HC7 Mar 2025WRIA/1745/2025

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Poonam Yadav v. State of U.P. (WRIT - A No. 1745 of 2025, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, Alok Mathur J., order dated 7.3.2025): writ petition allowed; Health Workers appointed after 01.12.2011 granted Grade Pay of Rs.2800/- on parity with similarly placed workers, the case being covered by Rekha Rani (Writ A No.2122 of 2025, dt. 20.2.2025) following Kamal Deep Nirala (Writ - A No. 20255 of 2021, dt. 04.07.2023, Article 14); arrears payable within four months.

What did the court decide?

Payment of Grade Pay of Rs.2800/- to the petitioners at par with other similarly situated persons, with arrears within four months; petitioners to furnish copies of the order and the antecedent judgments for compliance. ¶¶29

Poonam Yadav and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru… — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶¶29

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioners, Health Workers appointed after 01.12.2011 and denied Grade Pay of Rs.2800/- on that account, are entitled to Grade Pay of Rs.2800/- on parity with similarly placed Health Workers appointed on or before 01.12.2011.

¶¶11

Court's answer

Writ petition allowed: respondents directed to pay Grade Pay of Rs.2800/- to the petitioners as paid to other similarly situated persons, the case being covered by the judgment dated 20.2.2025 in Writ A No.2122 of 2025 (Rekha Rani), which itself extended Kamal Deep Nirala.

¶¶29

Ratio / Principle

Arrears of Grade Pay shall be paid to the petitioners within four months.

¶¶29

Key takeaways

Petitioners directed to provide a copy of the order along with the judgments dated 04.07.2023 and 20.2.2025 to the respondents for compliance.ratio¶¶30

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Service law - pay parity - Health Workers (Male and Female), Government of Uttar Pradesh, appointed after 01.12.2011 - paid Grade Pay of Rs.2000/- against Rs.2800/- paid to those appointed on or before 01.12.2011, in terms of government order dated 19.12.2011 - writ petition allowed on the ground that the case is fully covered by the judgment and order dated 20.2.2025 in Writ A No.2122 of 2025 (Rekha Rani and twenty others Vs. State of U.P. and others), which extended the benefit of the judgment dated 04.07.2023 in Writ - A No. 20255 of 2021 (Kamal Deep Nirala and Others), wherein this Court had held that paying different grade pay to similarly appointed Health Workers solely on the basis of their dates of appointment violates Article 14 - respondents directed to pay Grade Pay of Rs.2800/- with arrears within four months; petitioners to provide copies of the orders for compliance. (The Article 14 ruling is that of the quoted earlier judgment; the present court disposed of the matter on parity without independently re-deciding it.)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:14328

¶2

Court No. - 6

¶3

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1745 of 2025

¶4

Petitioner :- Poonam Yadav And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Medical And Health Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Misra,Mrs. Anju Raghuvansh,Pratyush Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.

¶6

Heard Sri Sanjay Misra, learned counsel for the petitioners and the Standing counsel for the respondents.

¶7

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the case of the petitioners is fully covered by the judgment and order of this Court dated 20.2.2025 passed in Writ A No.2122 of 2025 ( Rekha Rani and twenty others Vs. State of U.P. and others ).

¶8

Learned State counsel does not dispute the aforesaid fact.

¶9

Accordingly, the present petitioners are also granted the benefit of the judgment and order dated 20.2.2025 passed in Writ A No.2122 of 2025 which is quoted as under:-

¶10

" 1. Heard Sri Sanjay Misra, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.

¶11

2. Grievance raised by the petitioners in the present writ petition is with regard to grant of Grade Pay of Rs.2800/which is being denied to them on account of the fact that they have been appointed after 01.12.2011.

¶12

3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in the similar circumstances, this Court has allowed the writ petition filed by Kamal Deep Nirala and others being Writ - A No. 20255 of 2021 (decided on 04.07.2023). It is further submitted that review against order of this Court dated 04.07.2023 has also been rejected and the Special Appeal is pending.

¶13

4. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the State Government has complied with the directions of this Court dated 04.07.2023.

¶14

5. Learned Standing Counsel on the other hand has opposed the writ petition but could not dispute the aforesaid facts.

¶15

6. Accordingly, benefit of judgment and order dated

¶16

04.07.2023, passed by this Court in Writ - A No. 20255 of 2021 - Kamal Deep Nirala and Others Vs. State of U.P. Through Additional Chief Secretary, Medical and Health and Others (decided on 04.07.2023), is liable to be extended to the petitioners herein. For the sake of convenience, judgment and order dated 04.07.2023, is quoted herein below :-

¶17

"1. Heard Shri Sanjay Misra, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Ashwani Kumar Singh Rathore, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents.

¶18

2. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking grade pay of Rs.2800/- as is being paid to other similarly placed Health Workers, who were appointed on or before 01.12.2011.

¶19

3. The petitioners have been appointed after due selection on the post of Health Worker (Male and Female) in the Health Department, Government of Uttar Pradesh. Admittedly, they have been appointed after 01.12.2011. The petitioners are given same pay scale of Rs.5200-20200/- as is being given to the Health Workers who were appointed before 01.12.2011. The only difference is fixation of grade pay inasmuch as the petitioners are being paid grade pay of Rs.2000/- whereas the similarly placed Health Workers appointed on or before 01.12.2011 are being paid grade pay of Rs.2800/-.

¶20

4. Shri Sanjay Misra, learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that paying different grade pay to similarly appointed Health Workers on the ground of difference in their dates of appointment is wholly discriminatory and is in violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. He further submits that the petitioners are also entitled to be given the grade pay of Rs.2800/- as is being given to the similarly placed Health Workers who were appointed on or before 01.12.2011.

¶21

5. Shri Ashwani Kumar Singh Rathore, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents submits that the difference in grade pay is being given in pursuance of the government order dated 19.12.2011 which provides that the Health Workers appointed after 01.12.2011 would be given grade pay of Rs.2000/-. This Court asked a specific question to learned Standing Counsel that what was the basis for paying different grade pay to the Health Workers appointed on or before 01.12.2011 and the Health Workers appointed after 01.12.2011? to which he fairly submits that no reasoning is discernible in the government order except for cut of date for fixing the grade pay of Rs.2000/- instead of Rs.2800/-.

¶22

6. This Court finds that the executive instructions of the government order is in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The Government cannot discriminate in

¶23

the matter of payment of salary in respect of similarly appointed Health Workers only on the basis of their dates of appointment.

¶24

7. In view thereof, the present petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to pay grade pay of Rs.2800/- to the petitioners as is being paid to other similarly placed Health Workers from the date of their appointment. The arrears should be paid to the petitioners within a period of four months from today."

¶25

7. In view of the above, benefit of judgment and order dated 04.07.2023, passed by this Court in the case of Kamal Deep Nirala and Others (supra), is also extended to the petitioner herein in same terms.

¶26

8. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed.

¶27

9. The respondents are directed to pay Grade Pay of Rs.2800/to the petitioners as it has been paid to the other similarly situated persons. The arrears thereof shall be paid to the petitioners within next four months from today.

¶28

10. The petitioners are directed to provide a copy of this order alognwith copy of judgment and order dated 04.07.2023 to the respondents for compliance of the directions issued by this Court. "

¶29

In view of the above, the present writ petition is also allowed . The respondents are directed to pay Grade Pay of Rs.2800/- to the petitioners as it has been paid to the other similarly situated persons. The arrears thereof shall be paid to the petitioners within next four months from today.

¶30

The petitioners are directed to provide a copy of this order alognwith copy of judgment and order dated 04.07.2023 and 20.2.2025 to the respondents for compliance of the directions issued by this Court.

¶31

Order Date :- 7.3.2025 A. Verma

¶32

(Alok Mathur, J.)

¶33

Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Poonam Yadav and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Medical and Health Lko. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Poonam Yadav and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Medical and Health Lko. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Jitendra Prakash Pandey and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. and 2 Others

Hari Om Sharan (Head Constable) Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 2 Others

Azhad Husain Naqvi Vs State of U.P.Thru.Prin.Secy Irrigation and Water Resources andOR

Dharmveer Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Forest. Deptt. Lko and Another

Kunwar Devendra Pratap Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Food Civil Supply Deptt. Govt. Lko and Another

Naresh Chandra Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. and Another