Petitioner sought a mandamus directing respondent no.2 to decide her representation dated 21.07.2025 within a stipulated time. Counsel withdrew the petition on account of a technical inherent defect; the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 15203 of 2025
Smt Ruchi
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Puneet Kumar .....Respondent(s) |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : C.S.C. |
Court No. - 34
HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.
October 8, 2025
N.S.Rathour
(Vikas Budhwar,J.)
Digitally signed by :- NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Ruchi
State Of U.P.
Vikas Budhwar
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
