Dev Pati Ram v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Allahabad HC11 Sept 2025WRIA/13597/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dev Pati Ram v. State of U.P. and 4 others; WRIT - A No. 13597 of 2025; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad; Chandra Dhari Singh, J.; decided September 11, 2025; writ of mandamus; promotion to post of Lecturer Sanskrit; District Inspector of Schools, District Ghazipur; fresh representation to be filed within 15 days; direction to decide representation within eight weeks; disposed of without entering into merits; no objection by learned standing counsel D. K. Verma; counsel for petitioner Jitendra and Radheshyam Rpasad Kushwaha.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to file a fresh representation before respondent no.3 (District Inspector of Schools, District Ghazipur) within 15 days; respondent no.3 to decide the representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within eight weeks of receipt. ¶¶19

Dev Pati Ram vs State of U.P. and 4 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - A No. - 13597 of 2025

Dev Pati Ram

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. And 4 Others

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Jitendra Radheshyam	Rpasad	Kushwaha,
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C.
Court No.- 32

¶9

HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.

¶10

The instant writ petition has been filed seeking for the following relief:-

¶11

" (A) Issue a writ in the nature of of mandamus directing the respondent No.3 to consider the petitioner's grievance and promote him as on post of lecturer Sanskrit According to law."

¶12

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into the merits of the case made innocuous prayer that he may be permitted to file fresh representation before respondent no.3 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner.

¶13

Sri D. K. Verma, learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

¶14

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri D. K. Verma, learned Standing Counsel and perused the contents made in the writ petition.

¶15

Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner as no objection made by learned standing counsel. Petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with the present writ petition and certified copy of this order before respondent no.3 District Inspector of Schools, District Ghazipur within 15 days. After receiving the said representation, the

¶16

WRIA No. 13597 of 2025

¶17

¶18

respondent no.3 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the said representation.

¶19

With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of.

¶20

(Chandra Dhari Singh,J.)

¶21

September 11, 2025

¶22

AKT

¶23

Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Dev Pati Ram v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dev Pati Ram v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Committee of Management Sri Paniniya Gurukul vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Srimati Anita vs State of U.P. and 9 Others

Jitendra Kumar Dwivedi vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Manjay Kumar Sharma vs State of Up and 4 Others

C/M S.D. Ayurvedic Pharmacy College G.T. Road vs State of Uttar Pradesh and 3 Others

Shalini Dubey vs State of U.P. and 4 Others