The petitioner, a Staff Nurse, challenged the rejection of her request for transfer to Lucknow to remain with her husband. The Court held that transfer orders are executive decisions and guidelines do not create vested rights. The petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 10328 of 2025
Anuradha Rawat
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Med. Health Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others
.....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Avinash Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 8
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
WRIA No. 10328 of 2025
2
(Manish Mathur,J.)
September 17, 2025 kvg/-
Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether Government Order on couple postings creates a vested right for transfer to a specific location?
Whether the Court can issue a writ of Mandamus for transfer/posting matters?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Anuradha Rawat
State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Med. Health Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others
Manish Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
