PIL sought removal of encroachment on a pathway. State confirmed via written instructions that encroachment was removed and proceedings initiated under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code. Petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1032 of 2025
Pradeep Kumar Singh
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Revenue Lko. And 12 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amarendra Kumar Singh, Ram Mohan Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey
Court No. - 17
HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
(Subhash Vidyarthi,J.)
October 7, 2025
Ram.
Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether encroachment on revenue-recorded pathway should be removed?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pradeep Kumar Singh
State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Revenue Lko. And 12 Others
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
