Informant sought transfer of a 420/406 IPC trial from Bulandshahr to Chandauli. He instead agreed to appear through video conferencing; the High Court disposed of the transfer application directing that his application for video-conference appearance be considered and permitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
TRANSFER APPLICATION (CRIMINAL) No. - 524 of 2025
Ashwani Kumar Gupt
.....Applicant(s)
| Versus | |
|---|---|
| State Of U.P. And 2 Others | .....Opposite Party(s) |
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : Jay Prakash Gupta, Sunil Kumar Singh |
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) |
: G.A. |
| Court No.- 73 |
HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J.
November 6, 2025
Ankita
(Sameer Jain,J.)
Digitally signed by :- ANKITA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Should the criminal case be transferred from Bulandshahr, or may the applicant-informant instead appear via video conferencing?
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Ashwani Kumar Gupt
State of U.P.
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
