Transfer application seeking transfer of a 498A IPC dowry case from Bulandshahr to Ghaziabad was not pressed; applicants sought liberty to appear via video conferencing, which the State did not oppose.
Direction that applicants' application to appear through video conferencing shall be considered and they permitted to appear virtually.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
TRANSFER APPLICATION (CRIMINAL) No. - 523 of 2025
Manish And 4 Others
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
| State of U.P. and Another | .....Opposit |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : Harikrishna Rajesh |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : G.A. |
.....Opposite Party(s)
Court No. - 73
HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J.
November 6, 2025
Ankita
(Sameer Jain,J.)
Digitally signed by :- ANKITA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Manish And 4 Others
State of U.P.
Opposite Party No. 2
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
