Dismissed¶¶19

State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Nager Vikas Anubhag 4 Civil Secrt. Lko. and Another v. Suresh Kumar Sharma and Another

Allahabad HC21 Nov 2025SPLAD/275/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Special Appeal Defective No. 275 of 2024; State of U.P. v. Suresh Kumar Sharma; disposal application by respondents; appeal dismissed following State of U.P. and 2 others v. Dinesh Rai, Special Appeal No. 230 of 2024 (decided 15.09.2025) on identical/similar orders; related names: Badri Narayan Agnihotri, Chandra Mohan Yadav, Dr. Shyam Kumar; Bench: Arun Bhansali, CJ and Jaspreet Singh, J.; decided November 21, 2025.

What did the court decide?

The submissions made by counsel for the respondents (that the appeal arises out of an order similar to that appealed in Dinesh Rai) were not disputed by counsel for the appellants. ¶¶13

State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Nager Vikas Anubhag 4 Civil Secrt. Lko. and Another Vs Suresh Kumar Sharma and Another — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 275 of 2024

¶3

State of U.P. through Prin. Secy. Nager Vikas Anubhag 4 Civil Secrt. Lko. and another

¶4

.....Appellant(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

Suresh Kumar Sharma and another

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Counsel for Appellant(s)	: Pratul Sr	ivastava (S	.C.)
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: Manish	Mishra,	Sarvesh Kumar
	Saxena, Namit S	Akhilesh harma	Kumar Srivastava,

¶9

Chief Justice's Court

¶10

HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J.

¶11

The matter comes up upon an application filed by the respondents seeking disposal of the present appeal in the light of order in State of U.P. and 2 others Vs. Dinesh Rai : Special Appeal No. 230 of 2024 and other connected appeals, decided on 15.09.2025.

¶12

Submissions have been made that the present appeal arises out of the similar order which was subject matter of appeal in the case of Dinesh Rai (supra) and, therefore, the present appeal may also be decided in light of the said order.

¶13

The submissions made by counsel for the respondents are not disputed by counsel for the appellants.

¶14

In the case of Dinesh Rai (supra) it was, inter alia, observed by this Court as under:-

¶15

"12. In view of the above fact situation, wherein there is no dispute on the fact that the cases of all the respondents are similar to that of Badri Narayan Agnihotri (supra) and Chandra Mohan Yadav (supra), whose cases have attained finality upto Hon’ble Supreme Court, consequently, irrespective of the reliance placed by learned Single Judge in few of the cases in the case of Dr. Shyam Kumar (supra), which apparently had no application, the respondents are entitled to same relief as was accorded to Badri Narayan Agnihotri (supra) and Chandra Mohan Yadav (supra).

¶16

SPLAD No. 275 of 2024

¶17

¶18

Consequently, with the above slight clarification, there is no substance in the special appeals. The same are, therefore, dismissed."

¶19

In view of the submissions made, the present appeal also stands dismissed in the light of the order passed in the case of Dinesh Rai (supra) .

¶20

(Jaspreet Singh,J.) (Arun Bhansali,CJ.)

¶21

November 21, 2025

¶22

Rakesh/SL

¶23

Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Nager Vikas Anubhag 4 Civil Secrt. Lko. and Another v. Suresh Kumar Sharma and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Nager Vikas Anubhag 4 Civil Secrt. Lko. and Another v. Suresh Kumar Sharma and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of State Tax Lko. and 4 Others Vs Pratibha and 4 Others

M/S Regenvo Mobile Private Limited Lucknow Thru Its Director Rahul Singh and Anr. vs M/S Siyogi Enterprises Thru Managing Director and Others

Santosh Kumar Mishra vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Revenue and 8 Others

State of U.P Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. State Tax Govt. Sectt. Lko. and 4 Others Vs Km. Sunita Devi

Rajendra Prasad Yadav Vs State of U.P. Thru.Its Prin. Secy./Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Deptt. and 5 Others

Rajendra Prasad Yadav vs State of U.P. Thru.Its Prin. Secy./Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Deptt. and 5 Others