Special Appeal Defective No. 275 of 2024. The Bench raised a procedural irregularity regarding the name of the respondent's counsel missing from the case title and filed an order to address the issue. No substantive decision on merits was rendered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 275 of 2024
Appellant :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Nager Vikas Anubhag 4 Civil Secrt. Lko. And Another Respondent :- Suresh Kumar Sharma And Another Counsel for Appellant :- C.S.C.
Counsel for Respondent :- Sarvesh Kumar Saxena,Namit Sharma
Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
Put up before appropriate Bench of which one of us (Om Prakash Shukla, J.) is not a member showing the name of Sri Akhilesh Kumar Srivastava, Advocate as counsel for opposite party No.2.
( Om Prakash Shukla,J. ) ( Rajan Roy,J )
Order Date :- 13.5.2024 prateek
Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Nager Vikas Anubhag 4 Civil Secrt. Lko. And Another
Suresh Kumar Sharma And Another
Rajan Roy
Om Prakash Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
