Jay Singh vs State of U.P. and Another

The present application has been moved seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime no.287 of 2025, under Sections 121(2), 115(2), 191(2), 191(3), 190, 132, 121(1), 324, 351(3), 352 of B.N.S. and Section 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station Khauthan, District Jaunpur, with the prayer that in the event of arrest, applicant may be released on bail.

¶12

It is further submitted that as per allegation in the first information report, no specific role has been assigned to the applicant. It is further submitted that as per first information report, four accused, including the applicant and 40-50 unknown persons are said to have assaulted the first informant, as a result of which, first informant and his associates have received injures but none of the injures is dangerous to life. It is further submitted that the applicant is having no criminal history. It was also submitted that applicant undertakes to co-operate during trial and he would appear as and when required by the investigating agency or Court. It has been stated that in case, applicant is granted anticipatory bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail and will co-operate with the investigation and would obey all conditions of bail.

¶13

On the other hand, learned A.G.A. has opposed the application for anticipatory bail and it has been submitted by him that the applicant is having one criminal history relating to offence under Section 394 of I.P.C.

¶14

NABAIL No. 9567 of 2025

¶15

2

¶16

It may be stated that in case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra, (2011) 1 SCC 694, it has been held by Hon'ble Supreme Court that while deciding anticipatory bail, Court must consider nature and gravity of accusation, antecedent of accused, possibility of accused to flee from justice and that Court must evaluate entire available material against the accused carefully and that the exact role of the accused has also to be taken into consideration.

¶17

In the event of arrest of the applicant- Jay Singh involved in the aforesaid case crime shall be released on interim anticipatory bail till 10.12.2025 on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned, with the following conditions :-

¶18

(i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence and that he would appear before the trial Court on the date fixed unless exempted by the Court concerned;

¶19

(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her/them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶20

(iii) The applicant would co-operate during trial and would not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶21

(iv) The applicant shall not leave India without prior permission of the Court concerned.

¶22

In default of any of the conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.

¶23

List this case on 10.12.2025 as fresh.

¶24

In the meantime, learned counsel for the applicant is directed to file supplementary affidavit bringing on record the entire criminal history of the applicant.

¶25

November 26, 2025 RKM

¶26

(Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.)

¶27

Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Jay Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jay Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mohit Mishra vs State of U.P.

Shamshad vs State of U.P. and Another

Ashish Kumar vs State of U.P. and Another

Bhupendra vs State of U.P.

Sahil vs State of U.P.

Deepak Singhal vs State of U.P. and Another