Disposed

Bhupendra v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC26 Nov 2025NABAIL/9840/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applicant sought anticipatory bail in a Meerut case under multiple BNS sections for an alleged assault causing simple injuries. Relying on Supreme Court guidance on anticipatory bail considerations and noting a similarly placed co-accused was granted bail, the court granted interim anticipatory bail on conditions, listing the matter for further hearing.

What did the court decide?

Interim anticipatory bail till 10.12.2025 on personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties, with conditions.

Bhupendra vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9840 of 2025

Bhupendra

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P.

	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Sushil Kumar Dubey
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶8

Court No. - 72

¶9

HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J.

¶10

1. Heard Sri Fidosh Ahmad, holding brief of Sri Sushil Kumar Dubey, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Ashish Kumar Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶11

2. Present application has been moved seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 286 of 2025, under Sections 109(1), 191(2), 191(3), 333, 115(2), 352, 351(3) B.N.S., Police Station Parichhitgarh, District Meerut with the prayer that in the event of arrest, applicant may be released on bail.

¶12

3. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. submits that he has not received any instructions as yet.

¶13

4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and he has an apprehension that he may be arrested in the above-mentioned case. He further submits that no offence is made out against the applicant. It is further submitted that similarly placed coaccused Ajay has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 25.11.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application u/s 482 BNSS No. 9524 of 2025. It is further submitted that 03 persons received injuries in the alleged incident but all of them are simple in nature and no role has been assigned to the applicant. It is further submitted that the applicant is having criminal history, which has been explained in the supplementary affidavit. It was also submitted that

¶14

NABAIL No. 9840 of 2025

¶15

¶16

applicant undertakes to co-operate during trial and he would appear as and when required by the investigating agency or Court. It has been stated that in case, applicant is granted anticipatory bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail and will co-operate with the investigation and would obey all conditions of bail.

¶17

5. It may be stated that in case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra , (2011) 1 SCC 694, it has been held by Hon'ble Supreme Court that while deciding anticipatory bail, the Court must consider nature and gravity of accusation, antecedent of accused, possibility of accused to flee from justice and that Court must evaluate entire available material against the accused carefully and that the exact role of the accused has also to be taken into consideration.

¶18

6. Considering the above submissions of the learned counsel for the applicant and without expressing any opinion on merits, the applicant- Bhupendra involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on interim anticipatory bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned till 10.12.2025 with the following conditions :-

¶19

(i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence and that he would appear before the trial Court on the date fixed unless exempted by the Court concerned;

¶20

(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her/them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶21

(iii) The applicant would cooperate during trial and would not misuse the liberty of interim interim anticipatory bail bail.

¶22

(iv) The applicant shall not leave India without prior permission of the Court concerned.

¶23

7. In default of any of the conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of interim anticipatory bail

¶24

NABAIL No. 9840 of 2025

¶25

¶26

granted to the applicant herein.

¶27

8. List this case as fresh on 10.12.2025.

¶28

9. In the meantime, learned AGA may obtain instructions in the matter.

¶29

(Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.)

¶30

November 26, 2025

¶31

Abhishek

¶32

Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Bhupendra v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhupendra v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mohit Mishra vs State of U.P.

Shamshad vs State of U.P. and Another

Ashish Kumar vs State of U.P. and Another

Sahil vs State of U.P.

Deepak Singhal vs State of U.P. and Another

Mohammad Irshad vs State of U.P.