Praveen Alias Praveen Kumar v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Order listing the matter for filing a supplementary affidavit explaining cases pending against the applicant. No substantive decision rendered.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 69
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 6223 of 2025
Applicant :- Praveen Alias Praveen Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Sheel Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
Sri Arjun Singh Solanki, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the informant. The same is taken on record.
Learned AGA on the basis of instructions submits that the applicant has a criminal history.
Let a supplementary affidavit be filed by the counsel for the applicant, explaining the cases pending against the applicant.
Place this case as fresh on 21.08.2025, showing the name of Sri Arjun Singh Solanki as counsel for the opposite party no.2.
Order Date :- 5.8.2025 Lbm/-
Digitally signed by :- LAL BAHADUR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Praveen Alias Praveen Kumar
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Vivek Varma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- NABAIL/6223/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court