Criminal revision dismissed as infructuous after counsel informed the court that the revisionist had been convicted and the matter had become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:130686
Court No. - 86
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3036 of 2025
Revisionist :- Deepu Alias Lalla Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Satya Dheer Singh Jadaun Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
Heard Sri Satya Dheer Singh Jadaun, learned counsel for the revisionist and learned AGA for the State.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the revisionist informs that the matter has become infructuous after conviction of the revisionist and the same may be dismissed as infructuous.
Accordingly, this criminal revision is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 4.8.2025 A.N. Mishra
Digitally signed by :- AMARNATH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
State Of U.P.
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
