Hari Prakash and Another v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal revision dismissed as infructuous after conviction of the accused; notice not served on opposite party no. 2; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Court No. 86; single judge Nalin Kumar Srivastava; revisionist Hari Prakash and another represented by Vinay Kumar Tripathi; opposite parties State of U.P. and another represented by G.A.; decided 4.8.2025; neutral citation 2025:AHC:129962.
What did the court decide?
The criminal revision is dismissed as infructuous, having become infructuous after conviction of the accused. ¶¶7