Disposed¶13

Yama @ Durgvijay v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC19 Feb 2025NABAIL/1281/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court, Deepak Verma, J., anticipatory bail application u/s 482 BNSS not pressed on merit; refusal of anticipatory bail; direction for expeditious disposal of regular bail per Satender Kumar Antil (2021 SCC OnLine SC 922); interim protection from coercive action for two weeks or till surrender; IPC 147/149/323/308/504/506; Case Crime No. 76 of 2024; P.S. Kurra, District Mainpuri; disposed of on 19.2.2025.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail refused; applicant directed that if he surrenders within two weeks and applies for regular bail, it shall be decided expeditiously in accordance with Satender Kumar Antil; no coercive action against him for two weeks or till surrender, whichever is earlier. ¶13

Yama @ Durgvijay vs State of U.P. and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:23763

¶2

Court No. - 70

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1281 of 2025

¶4

Applicant :- Yama @ Durgvijay Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Kumar Rathore,Sanjeev Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶7

The instant Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with a prayer to grant an anticipatory bail to the applicant in Case Crime No. 76 of 2024, under Sections 147, 149, 323, 308, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station- Kurra, District- Mainpuri.

¶8

After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the applicant has not pressed the relief as sought by means of this application on merit and prayed for issuance of appropriate direction to the concerned Courts below to decide the bail application of the applicant expeditiously.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has no objection in allowing the aforesaid prayer of the applicant.

¶10

Accordingly the relief as sought by the applicant through this application is refused.

¶11

Considering the aforesaid alternative prayer of the applicant, it is directed that if applicant surrender before the concerned Court below within two weeks from today and applies for regular bail, the bail application shall be decided expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another , reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922.

¶12

For the period of two weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against him.

¶13

With the aforesaid directions, this anticipatory bail application stands disposed of.

¶14

Order Date :- 19.2.2025//Sanjeet

¶15

Digitally signed by :- SANJEET KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Yama @ Durgvijay v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yama @ Durgvijay v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Waseem Ahmad vs State of U.P.

Banarasi Yadav vs State of U.P.

Susendra Alias Suchendra and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Indraj and 3 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Fujail Ahmad vs State of U.P. and Another

Jamila Khatoon and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and Another