Disposed¶8

Susendra Alias Suchendra and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC18 Feb 2025NABAIL/1250/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail refused as not pressed; protection from coercive action for two weeks or till surrender; direction to courts below for expeditious regular bail decision per Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI, 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922; S. 482 BNSS; Ss. 147, 354, 323 IPC; Case Crime No. 40 of 2023; P.S. Araul, Kanpur Nagar; Neutral Citation 2025:AHC:23032; Deepak Verma, J.; order dated 18.2.2025.

What did the court decide?

Main prayer for anticipatory bail refused; alternative prayer allowed by direction that if the applicants surrender within two weeks and apply for regular bail, the courts below shall decide the bail applications expeditiously in accordance with Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI (2021 SCC OnLine SC 922); no coercive action against the applicants for two weeks or till surrender, whichever is earlier. ¶8

Susendra Alias Suchendra and Another vs State of U.P… — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶8

Issue for consideration

Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicants in Case Crime No. 40 of 2023 under Sections 147, 354, 323 IPC, Police Station Araul, District Kanpur Nagar. +1 more

¶2

Court's answer

The relief sought through the anticipatory bail application is refused, the applicants having not pressed it on merit.

¶5

Ratio / Principle

If the applicants surrender before the court below within two weeks and apply for regular bail, their bail applications shall be decided expeditiously in accordance with the law laid down by the Apex Court in Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI, 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922.

¶6

Key takeaways

No coercive action shall be taken against the applicants for two weeks from the date of the order or until they surrender before the court below, whichever is earlier.ratio¶7

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Anticipatory bail under S. 482 BNSS (Allahabad High Court, Deepak Verma, J., order dated 18.2.2025) in Case Crime No. 40 of 2023 under Sections 147, 354, 323 IPC, P.S. Araul, District Kanpur Nagar: counsel for the applicants did not press the anticipatory bail prayer on merit and sought only a direction for expeditious disposal of a regular bail application upon surrender. The Court refused the relief sought, directed that if the applicants surrender within two weeks and apply for regular bail their applications be decided expeditiously in accordance with the law laid down in Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation, 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922, and ordered that no coercive action be taken against them for two weeks or till surrender, whichever is earlier. Application disposed of.

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:23032

¶2

Court No. - 70

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1250 of 2025 Applicant :- Susendra Alias Suchendra And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- R.S. Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶6

The instant Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicants in Case Crime No. 40 of 2023, under Sections 147, 354, 323 IPC, Police Station- Araul, District- Kanpur Nagar.

¶7

After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the applicants have not pressed the relief as sought by means of this application on merit and prayed for issuance of appropriate direction to the concerned Courts below to decide the bail application of the applicants expeditiously.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has no objection in allowing the aforesaid prayer of the applicants.

¶9

Accordingly the relief as sought by the applicants through this application is refused.

¶10

Considering the aforesaid alternative prayer of the applicants, it is directed that if applicants surrender before the concerned Court below within two weeks from today and apply for regular bail, their bail applications shall be decided expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another , reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922.

¶11

For the period of two weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicants before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against them.

¶12

With the aforesaid directions, this anticipatory bail application stands disposed of.

¶13

Order Date :- 18.2.2025/Anjali

¶14

Digitally signed by :- ANJALI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Susendra Alias Suchendra and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Susendra Alias Suchendra and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Vikas vs State of U.P. and Another

Ranjeet Kumar vs State of U.P. and Another

Aarif Alias Mohd Asif vs State of U.P.

Laik @ Kalia vs State of U.P.

Anuj vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Sonu and Another vs State of U.P. and Another