This court disposed of an anticipatory bail application after the applicant restricted their prayer to seek an opportunity to file a fresh bail application. The matter was left open for the applicant to file a formal bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 126 of 2025
Sonu
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashish Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 13
HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
September 8, 2025 S. Shivhare
(Subhash Vidyarthi,J.)
Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to dispose of the anticipatory bail application or direct filing of a fresh bail application.
Whether the implications of the Supreme Court judgment in Satendra Kumar Antil apply to grant interim bail.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherFollowed¶11
Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another: (2022) 10 SCC 51 · Who else cites this
Sonu
State Of U.P.
SUBHASH VIDYARTHI
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
