Smt Foolan Dei v. State of U.P through Principal Secretary Home Gov. of U.P at Lucknow

Allahabad HC20 Feb 2025NABAIL/1098/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail refused; direction for expeditious decision on regular bail upon surrender within two weeks; protection from coercive action for interim period; reliance on Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI.

What did the court decide?

Direction to lower courts to decide regular bail application expeditiously if applicant surrenders within two weeks; protection from coercive action for two weeks or until surrender. ¶¶15

Smt Foolan Dei vs State of U.P through Principal… — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:25115

¶2

Court No. - 70

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1098 of 2025

¶4

Applicant :- Smt Foolan Dei Opposite Party :- State Of U.P Through Principal Secretary Home Gov. Of U.P At Lucknow Counsel for Applicant :- Dwijendra Prasad,Pradyumna Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

¶6

Sri Vivekanand Rai, Advocate has filed vakalatnama on behalf of the informant. It is taken on record.

¶7

Heard Sri Dwijendra Prasad, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶8

The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. .0034 of 2024, under Sections 323, 452, 504, 506, 308, 324 IPC, Police Station- Fatehpur Sikari, DistrictAgra.

¶9

On the matter being taken up, learned counsel for the applicant has not pressed the relief as sought by means of this application on merit and prayed for issuance of appropriate direction to the concerned Courts below to decide the bail application of the applicant expeditiously.

¶10

Learned A.G.A. has no objection in allowing the aforesaid prayer of the applicant.

¶11

Accordingly the relief as sought by the applicant through this application is refused.

¶12

Considering the aforesaid alternative prayer of the applicant, it is directed that if applicant surrenders before the concerned Court below within two weeks from today and applies for regular bail, the bail application shall be decided expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC Online SC 922.

¶13

For the period of two weeks from today or till the time of

¶14

surrender of the applicant before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against him.

¶15

With the aforesaid directions, this anticipatory bail application stands disposed of.

¶16

Order Date :- 20.2.2025 RPD

¶17

Digitally signed by :- RATAN PRAKASH DWIVEDI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Smt Foolan Dei v. State of U.P through Principal Secretary Home Gov. of U.P at Lucknow

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Foolan Dei v. State of U.P through Principal Secretary Home Gov. of U.P at Lucknow

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Neelam vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Yama @ Durgvijay vs State of U.P. and Another

Mohd Hanif vs State of U.P. and Another

Omkar Singh and 2 Others vs State of Up and Another

Himanshu Singh vs State of U.P.

Shyam Singh and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and Another