Rohit Patel v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application under S. 482 BNSS disposed of as infructuous; applicant Rohit Patel already arrested and granted regular bail by the concerned court; Additional Advocate General concurred; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Court No. 86, Dr. Gautam Chowdhary, J.; order dated 27.5.2025; neutral citation 2025:AHC:90756; case no. 10673 of 2024; counsel Sunil Kumar Singh; opposite party State of U.P. represented by G.A.
What did the court decide?
The anticipatory bail application having become infructuous (निष्प्रभावी) — counsel having reported, and the learned Additional Advocate General having concurred, that the applicant had already been arrested and granted regular bail by the concerned court — the court disposed of (निरस्त किया) the application on that account. ¶9