Dismissed¶7
Krishna Kumar Pandey v. State of U.P. and Another
Allahabad HCABAIL/2601/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail; S.438 CrPC; dismissed for want of prosecution; none present for applicant; interim order vacated; Krishna Kumar Pandey; State of U.P.; Court No. 86; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad; Judge Dr. Gautam Chowdhary; Order Date 26.5.2025.
What did the court decide?
The present anticipatory bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution because none appeared for the applicant to press it. ¶7