The Court directed the trial court to decide a pending maintenance application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. expeditiously, preferably within six months, following compliance with affidavits prescribed in Rajnesh vs. Neha.
Direction issued to trial court to decide the maintenance case within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4457 of 2025
Smt Sweta Jaiswal And Another
.....Applicant(s)
| Versus | |
|---|---|
| State of U.P. and Another | .....Opposite Party(s) |
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : Mayank Pratap Singh, Mayank Verma |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : G.A. |
| Court No.- 87 |
HON'BLE ANIL KUMAR-X, J.
November 21, 2025 Ujjawal
(Anil Kumar-X,J.)
Digitally signed by :- UJJAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Should the trial court decide the pending maintenance application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. expeditiously?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Rajnesh vs. NehaReferred¶10
Rajnesh vs. Neha
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt Sweta Jaiswal And Another
State of U.P. and Another
Anil Kumar-X
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
