The applicant sought quashing of proceedings under Section 528 BNSS against charges under Section 3 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act. The Court dismissed the application, holding that once charges are framed and witness statements recorded, the chargesheet and cognizance order cannot be quashed.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 45032 of 2025
Rashid And Another
.....Applicant(s)
| Versus | |
|---|---|
| State of U.P. and Another | .....Opposite Party(s) |
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : Ankur Singh |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : G.A. |
Court No. - 78
HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.
NA528 No. 45032 of 2025
2
(Vivek Kumar Singh,J.)
November 17, 2025
A.P. Pandey
Digitally signed by :- ANAND PRAKASH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should quash the chargesheet and cognizance order at this stage of trial?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rashid And Another
Vivek Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
