Application to quash chargesheet and summoning order in an Essential Commodities Act case. The High Court found no grounds for interference and refused the prayer, disposing of the application with directions for surrender and expeditious bail consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 43827 of 2025
Bindu Lal And 3 Others
| Versus |
.....Applicant(s) | |
|---|---|---|
| State of U.P. and Another | .....Opposite Party(s) |
|
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : Birendra Kumar, Vijay |
Pratap Yadav |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : G.A. |
Court No. - 78
HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.
NA528 No. 43827 of 2025
2
apply for bail, their bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022 SCC OnLine SC 825) .
(Vivek Kumar Singh,J.)
November 17, 2025
Radhika
Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the chargesheet and summoning order under Sections 3/7 Essential Commodities Act should be quashed.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherRelied on¶6
(2022 SCC OnLine SC 825) · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Bindu Lal
State of U.P.
Vivek Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
