The applicant sought to withdraw the application to raise grounds before the trial court. The application was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty granted to the applicant to appear before the concerned Court within three weeks to seek bail, which would be disposed of expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 39997 of 2025
Priya Sharma @ Priyanka Sharma
| Versus | .....Applicant(s) | |
|---|---|---|
| State of U.P. and Another | .....Opposite Party(s) |
|
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : Shivam Shukla, |
Vinod Kumar |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : G.A. |
Court No. - 83
HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.
(Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.)
November 19, 2025
A. Pandey
Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Priya Sharma @ Priyanka Sharma
Rajiv Lochan Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
