Disposed¶17

Sandeep Maurya v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC23 Sept 2025NA528/36681/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 528 BNSS; expeditious bail disposal direction; Satendra Kumar Antil (2021) 10 SCC 773; surrender within two weeks; no coercive action till surrender; bail application Case No. 14448 of 2023; Crime No. 123 of 2019; Sections 498A, 304B IPC; Sections 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act; P.S. Pannuganj; District Sonbhadra; Sandeep Maurya v. State of U.P.; Allahabad High Court; Deepak Verma, J.; September 23, 2025; Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 36681 of 2025; disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Main relief refused; alternative prayer allowed by directing the applicant to surrender within two weeks, expeditious disposal of any bail application by the courts below in accordance with law, and protection from coercive action for two weeks or till surrender, whichever is earlier. ¶17

Sandeep Maurya vs State of U.P. — Dowry and Cruelty | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 36681 of 2025

¶3

Sandeep Maurya

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Chandra Shekhar Kushwaha Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

¶6

Court No. - 72

¶7

HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J.

¶8

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶9

This application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed by the applicant to direct the court below to consider and decide the bail application of applicant according to law laid down in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil Vs C.B.I. And Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773, bearing Case No. 14448 of 2023, arising out of Crime No. 123 of 2019, under Sections 498A, 304B I.P.C. and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station- Pannuganj, DistrictSonbhadra.

¶10

On the matter being taken up, learned counsel for the applicant has not pressed the relief as sought by means of this application on merit and prayed for issuance of appropriate direction to the concerned Courts below to decide the bail application of the applicant expeditiously.

¶11

Learned A.G.A. has no objection in allowing the aforesaid prayer of the applicant.

¶12

Accordingly, the relief as sought by the applicant through this application is refused .

¶13

Considering the aforesaid alternative prayer of the applicant, it is directed that applicant shall surrender before the concerned Court below within two weeks from today and in case applies for bail, the bail application shall be decided expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law.

¶14

NA528 No. 36681 of 2025

¶15

¶16

For the period of two weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against him.

¶17

With the aforesaid directions, this application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. stands disposed of .

¶18

(Deepak Verma,J.)

¶19

September 23, 2025

¶20

Aditya

¶21

Digitally signed by :- ADITYA KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sandeep Maurya v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sandeep Maurya v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Siddh Sharan Mishra and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Rajesh Rajbhar and 7 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt Gulshan and 7 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Sajjan Singh vs State of U.P. and Another

Narendra vs State of U.P. and Another

Qayyum vs State of U.P.