Dismissed¶4

Smt Gulshan and 7 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC22 Sept 2025NA528/35325/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court; Deepak Verma, J.; 3 November 2025; Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 35325 of 2025; Smt Gulshan and 7 others v. State of U.P.; inherent jurisdiction; withdrawal with liberty to seek alternative remedy; bar on invoking inherent jurisdiction where appeal under Section 14A of the 1989 Act available; reliance on Full Bench judgment Ghulam Rasool Khan v. State of U.P. (para 17(iii)); references Section 482 Cr.P.C.; dismissed as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to avail alternative/appropriate remedy; certified copy of the F.I.R./order sheet to be returned to the applicant as per rule after retaining a photo-stat copy. ¶4

Smt Gulshan and 7 Others vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 35325 of 2025

¶3

Smt Gulshan And 7 Others

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of U.P. and Another

¶7

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶8

Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd. Afzal
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

¶9

Court No. - 74

¶10

HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J.

¶11

Vakalatnama filed today by Sri Mahendra Pratap, Advocate, on behalf of opposite party no.2, is taken on record.

¶12

The full Bench judgment passed in Ghulam Rasool Khan and others Vs. State of U.P. and others the Court in para-17 (iii) has held that Question No. (III) is answered in negative holding that the aggrieved person having remedy of appeal under Section 14A of the 1989 Act, cannot be allowed to invoke inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

¶13