Disposed

Mohd. Faraz and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC17 Sept 2025NA528/34632/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court directed the sending of a certified copy of a compromise petition to the District and Sessions Judge for verification. The trial court was tasked with verifying the compromise in the presence of both parties and submitting a report. Coercive action was stayed until the next date of hearing.

What did the court decide?

No coercive action directed until next hearing; matter remanded for verification of compromise.

Mohd. Faraz and 3 Others vs State of U.P. and Another — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 34632 of 2025

¶3

Mohd. Faraz And 3 Others

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of U.P. and Another

¶7

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶8

Counsel for Applicant(s)	: G.S.	Chauhan
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶9

Court No. - 89

¶10

HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J.

¶11

Shri Diwas Verma, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2 is taken on record.

¶12

Heard Shri G.S.Chauhan, learned counsel for the applicants and Shri O.P. Singh, learned AGA for the State-opposite party no.1.

¶13

This application U/S 528 BNSS has been preferred for quashing of the entire proceedings of Session Trial No.200 of 2023 (State of U.P. Vs. Mohd. Faraz and others), arising out of Case Crime No.551 of 2020, under sections 341, 323, 325, 504, 506, 307 of IPC, Police Station Kotwali, District Jhansi, pending in the court of learned District and Session Judge, Jhansi.

¶14

It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromise and certified copy of the same has already been filed, which is on the record. He further submits that said compromise needs to be verified by the learned court concerned and he prays that same may be sent to the court concerned i.e. learned District and Session Judge, Jhansi.

¶15

On the other hand, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 as well as learned AGA for the State have no objection to the above submissions of learned counsel of the applicants.

¶16

In view of the above, office is directed to send the certified copy of compromise to the court concerned i.e. learned District and Sessions Judge, Jhansi, for verification of the same. The applicants and opposite party no.2 are directed to appear before the court concerned on 15.10.2025.

¶17

NA528 No. 34632 of 2025

¶18

¶19

Learned court concerned i.e. learned District and Session Judge, Jhansi, shall verify the compromise in the presence of both the parties and submit a compromise verification report to this Court, within two weeks thereafter.

¶20

Learned counsel for the applicants may also file a supplementary affidavit bringing on record the proceedings of the compromise, within two weeks, after verification of the compromise.

¶21

List this case on 12.11.2025 as fresh, before the appropriate Bench.

¶22

Till the next date of listing, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants.

¶23

September 17, 2025 RKM

¶24

(Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.)

¶25

Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Mohd. Faraz and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohd. Faraz and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Harikesh Bahadur Singh vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Labh @ Bovi vs State of U.P. and Another

Subhash Rana and 3 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Raju Nishad and 13 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Jaiprakash and 3 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Shiv Charan vs State of U.P. and Another