Harikesh Bahadur Singh v. State of U.P. and 5 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjournment order only: the A.G.A. sought time to obtain instructions; the application was listed afresh for a later date. Nothing was decided.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 29231 of 2025
Harikesh Bahadur Singh
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 5 Others
.....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Om Prakash Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 71
HON'BLE RAJ BEER SINGH, J.
Learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
Learned A.G.A. seeks time to obtain instructions in the matter.
Put up this case on 24.09.2025, as fresh.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Harikesh Bahadur Singh
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Raj Beer Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- NA528/29231/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Sanjiv Kumar
- Order 2 · Sanjiv Kumar
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court