Disposed¶12

Jitendra Kumar v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC18 Sept 2025NA528/18467/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court adjournment order dated September 9, 2025 by Justice Jitendra Kumar Sinha (Court No. 89) in Application U/S 528 BNSS No. - 18467 of 2025, Jitendra Kumar versus State of U.P. and Another, connected with Criminal Misc. Application U/s 528 B.N.S.S. No.-5450 of 2025 (Navneet Kumar Vs. State of U.P.); records unavailable at first and revised calls; matter listed fresh for 18.09.2025; both applications to be heard even if opposite party no.2 in connected matter remains unrepresented; counsel: Neeraj Srivastava and Pooja Srvastava for applicant, G.A. and B.P. Maurya (A.G.A.) for State, Sachin Kumar (opposite party no.2, connected matter) and Pavan Kumar (applicant, connected matter); Section 528 BNSS.

What did the court decide?

None; the matter was deferred and ordered to be listed fresh for hearing on 18.09.2025. ¶12

Jitendra Kumar vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 18467 of 2025

¶3

Jitendra Kumar

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

	Versus
State of U.P. and Another	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Neeraj Srivastava, Pooja Srvastava
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶6

Court No. - 89

¶7

HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J.

¶8

List has been revised.

¶9

Heard Mr. Neeraj Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. B.P. Maurya, learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶10

No one appears on behalf of opposite party no.2 in the connected matter. The records of the case were not available when the case was called out in the first call and in the revised call.

¶11

On the request of learned counsel for the applicant, the case was posted for hearing at 02:00 P.M. When the matter was taken up, Mr. Neeraj Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant in Criminal Misc. Application U/s 528 B.N.S.S. No.-18467 of 2025 is present along with learned A.G.A. The name of Mr. Sachin Kumar is appearing as counsel for the opposite party no.2 in connected Criminal Misc. Application U/s 528 B.N.S.S. No.5450 of 2025 (Navneet Kumar Vs. State of U.P.) but he is not present. Mr. Pavan Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant in connected Criminal Misc. Application U/s 528 B.N.S.S. No.-5450 of 2025 (Navneet Kumar Vs. State of U.P.) is also present.

¶12

Since both the applications are connected and the records were not available when the case was called out in the first call as well as in the revised call, in the interest of justice, list this case as fresh on 18.09.2025.

¶13

It is made clear that if on the next date, if no one appears on behalf of

¶14

NA528 No. 18467 of 2025

¶15

¶16

opposite party no.2 in connected matter, both the applications shall be heard in their absence.

¶17

(Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.)

¶18

September 9, 2025

¶19

Virendra

¶20

Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR BHARTEEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Jitendra Kumar v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jitendra Kumar v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Jeevan Ram vs State of U.P. and Another

Uma Shankar Verma vs State of Up and 4 Others

Krishna and 2 Others vs State of U.P.

Dinesh Singh vs State of U.P. and Another

Vinod Kumar Yadav @ V.K. Yadav @ Vinod Yadav vs State of U.P. and Another

Dharm Narayan vs State of U.P. and Another