Dismissed¶9

Sonu Pandey v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC13 May 2025NA528/16596/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 528 BNSS application dismissed as infructuous; expeditious disposal of trial; speedy conclusion direction; S.S.T. No. 450 of 2017, State v. Sonu Pandey; Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge POCSO Act Court No. 1 Gorakhpur; complete evidence adduced; Sonu Pandey v. State of U.P.; Allahabad High Court; Avnish Saxena, J.; 19.11.2025.

What did the court decide?

Application dismissed as infructuous; trial court requested to expedite S.S.T. No. 450 of 2017 and conclude it at an early date. ¶9

Sonu Pandey vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 16596 of 2025

¶3

Sonu Pandey

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

	Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others	....	.Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Aryan Srivastava, Prakash Srivastava	Chandra
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶6

Court No. - 81

¶7

HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.

¶8

Shri Chandra Shekhar, learned Advocate, holding brief, appears for the applicant and submits that the matter has become infructuous. He further submits that this Court may direct for expeditious disposal of the trial, as the complete evidence has been adduced.

¶9

Accordingly, the present application under Section 528 BNSS is dismissed as infructuous.

¶10

The trial court (Additional Sessions Judge/ Special Judge, POCSO Act, Court No. 1, Gorakhpur) may expedite the trial (S.S.T. No. 450 of 2017, State v. Sonu Pandey) and conclude the same at an early date.

¶11

(Avnish Saxena,J.)

¶12

November 19, 2025

¶13

Rama Kant

¶14

Digitally signed by :- RAMA KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sonu Pandey v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sonu Pandey v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shiv Shankar vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Another

Asif vs State of U.P.

Rampal Ahirwar vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Gopal Prasad Sharma vs State of U.P. and Another

Rashmikant vs State of U.P. and Another

Madhu @ Mamata vs State of U.P. and Another