Rashmikant v. State of U.P. and Another
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 70
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 13618 of 2025
Applicant :- Rashmikant Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Jeet Narayan Dubey,Shyam Shankar Mishra
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
- Heard Mr. Jeet Narayan Dubey, the learned counsel for applicant and the learned A.G.A. for State-opposite party-1.
- Perused the record.
- On the matter being taken up, a request for adjournment has been prayed by the learned counsel for applicant.
- Order sheet shows that adjournment prayed for by the learned counsel for applicant is the first adjournment.
- In view of above, the hearing of present application is adjourned.
- Matter shall re-appear as fresh on 14.05.2025.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Rashmikant
- respondent
State of U.P.
- respondent
Opposite Party No. 2
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- NA528/13618/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Avnish Saxena
- Order 2 · Avnish Saxena
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court