Disposed

Tasleem v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Allahabad HC26 Aug 2025NA528/1013/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Allahabad allowed an application under Section 528 BNSS. The applicant, holding bail in five cases, sought a single set of sureties and bonds for all. Relying on Hani Nishad, the Court disposed of the petition, directing the applicant to furnish one personal bond and two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each, valid for all cases.

What did the court decide?

Direction to applicant to furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of the like amount in one case, valid for all five cases.

Tasleem Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1013 of 2025

Tasleem

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

¶7

	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Amit Kumar
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶8

Court No. - 14

¶9

HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.

¶10

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record.

¶11

2. By means of the instant applicant, the applicant has prayed that this Court may be pleased to direct the learned Court below not to insist the petitioner to file separate sureties and bonds in each and every five cases and accept only two sureties and one personal bond in lieu of all five cases.

¶12

3. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that it has become impossible for the applicant to submit separate sureties and bonds in each of cases, in which, he has been granted bail. He added that the applicant has been granted bail in five cases arising out of following Case Crime Numbers :-

¶13

Case Crime No. 267 of 2024, under Sections 3/5/8 Cow Slaughter Act, PS - Khamariya District - Lakhimpur Kheri.

¶14

Case Crime No. 465 of 2024, under Sections 3/5/8 Cow Slaughter Act, PS - Dhaurahara District - Lakhimpur Kheri.

¶15

Case Crime No. 423 of 2024, under Sections 109(1) BNS, PS - Isha Nagar District - Lakhimpur Kheri.

¶16

Case Crime No. 466 of 2024, under Sections 109(1) BNS, PS - Dhaurahara District - Lakhimpur Kheri.

¶17

NA528 No. 1013 of 2025

¶18

¶19

Case Crime No. 325 of 2024, under Sections 3/5/8 Cow Slaughter Act, PS - Neem Gaon District - Lakhimpur Kheri.

¶20

4. He next added that despite the Trial Court granted the bail in aforesaid matters, the applicant is still in jail. Being poor person, he is unable to produce the sureties in each cases. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018] the Supreme Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the petitioner to submit separate personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases.

¶21

5. Referring the aforesaid judgement and order, he submits that the applicant may also be given the benefit of the ratio of the judgement passed in Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (supra).

¶22

6. Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed off with a direction to the applicant to furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of the like amount in one case, which shall be treated to be valid in all other cases wherein the bail orders have been passed.

¶23

August 26, 2025 Mayank

¶24

(Shree Prakash Singh,J.)

¶25

Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Tasleem v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tasleem v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Anoop Kumar Kalra and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Ram Narayan Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 2 Others

Shri Ram and 6 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Devmani Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko and 3 Others

Ram Awadh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko

Satyam Mishra @ Sunny Mishra Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. and Another