Disposed

Satyam Mishra @ Sunny Mishra v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC26 Aug 2025A482/6884/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applicant sought quashing of chargesheet and related proceedings under SC/ST Act offences. Counsel did not press the application, seeking liberty to file a bail application before the trial court. The court disposed of the application, directing that a bail application filed within two weeks be decided expeditiously per Satender Kumar Antil.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file bail application before trial court; such application to be decided expeditiously in view of Satender Kumar Antil guidelines.

Satyam Mishra @ Sunny Mishra Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy… — Caste Atrocities | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6884 of 2025

¶3

Satyam Mishra @ Sunny Mishra

¶4

.....Applicant(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) : Counsel for Applicant(s) Amit Kumar Singh, Ashwini Pratap Singh, Gaurav Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s): G.A.

¶5

Court No. - 14

¶6

HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.

¶8

Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C has been filed to quash the chargesheet No. 01, dated 22.12.2022 filed in Sessions Trial No. 56 of 2023, arising out of Case Crime No. 187 of 2022, under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) of SC/ST Act, Police Station Jaitpur, District Ambedkar Nagar, summoning order dated 06.04.2023 passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Ambedkar Nagar, NBW and process issued under Sections 82 and 83 of Cr.P.C. as well as entire proceedings in pursuance thereof.

¶9

Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and was never involved in committing the offence as has been mentioned in the First Information Report. He added that due to enmity, his name has been planted in the First Information Report and thereafter he has been chargesheeted. He next added that due to unavoidable circumstances, he could not appear before the court below.

¶10

At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he

¶11

A482 No. 6884 of 2025

¶12

¶13

does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51.

¶14

Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant.

¶15

On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties', it is provided that in case, the applicant appears before the trial court within two weeks from today and file bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra).

¶16

The application is disposed of accordingly.

¶17

August 26, 2025

¶18

kkv/

¶19

(Shree Prakash Singh,J.)

¶20

Digitally signed by :- KRISHAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Satyam Mishra @ Sunny Mishra v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satyam Mishra @ Sunny Mishra v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Anoop Kumar Kalra and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Ram Narayan Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 2 Others

Shri Ram and 6 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Devmani Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko and 3 Others

Ram Awadh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko

Tasleem Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.