Dismissed¶17

Smt. Lakshmi (Detenue) v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 3 Others

Allahabad HC13 Nov 2025HABC/412/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench; HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 412 of 2025; petitioner/detenue Smt. Lakshmi (w/o Rohit d'o Prithvi Pal), petition filed through Rohit; reliefs: production of detenue and liberty, residence with petitioner if she desires; detenue stated before Court she does not want to accompany Rohit; counsel Alok Kumar Singh did not press the petition; respondents: State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 3 Others (counsel: G.A.; Arun Kumar Pandey, State Law Officer; Ravindra Kumar Singh for opposite party No. 4); prior Court order dated 13.11.2025; dismissed as withdrawn on November 26, 2025; Judge: Saurabh Lavania, J.; no statute or precedent cited; no monetary relief.

What the court decided

Smt. Lakshmi (Detenue) vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 412 of 2025

¶3

Smt. Lakshmi (Detenue)

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And 3 Others

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Alok Kumar Singh
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: G.A.
Court No.- 13

¶9

HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.

¶10

Heard Sri Alok Kumar Singh, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Arun Kumar Pandey, learned State Law Officer and Sri Ravindra Kumar Singh, Advocate, who has put in appearance and filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite party No. 4 in the Court today, which is taken on record, as well as perused the record.

¶11

In terms of this Court's order dated 13.11.2025, Smt. Lakshmi (Detenue) is present before this Court duly identified by Sri Sri Alok Kumar Singh, Advocate.

¶12

The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):-

¶13

"i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Habeas Corpus commanding Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to produce the detenue Smt. Lakshmi (w/o Rohit d'o Prithvi Pal) before this Hon'ble Court forthwith and set her at liberty.

¶14

ii. Direct that the detenue, being a major and legally wedded wife of the petitioner, be permitted to reside with the petitioner if she so desires, without interference from respondents or any person."

¶15

Taking note of the statement of Smt. Lakshmi (Detenue) present before this Court that she does not want to accompany Rohit, through whom the instant petition has been filed, on being confronted, the learned counsel for the petitioner says that he does not want to press the instant petition and it may accordingly be dismissed as withdrawn.

¶16

The aforesaid has not been opposed.

¶17

In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶18

November 26, 2025 Arun/-

¶19

(Saurabh Lavania,J.)

¶20

Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Smt. Lakshmi (Detenue) v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Smt. Lakshmi (Detenue) v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Afzal Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. and Others

Rajesh Kumar Vs District Magistrate, Shravasti and 2 Others

Lala Alias Intsar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Satish Lodhi vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Zafar @ Chanda vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko.

Anil Kumar Dwivedi vs Mr.Shiv Sahay Awasthi Dist. Magistrate, Dist-Pratapgarh