Criminal revision with an application for condonation of delay; the High Court issued notice to opposite party Nos.2 and 3 and listed the matter, clarifying that pendency of the revision confers no interim protection on the revisionist.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 11
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 364 of 2025
Revisionist :- Gangaram Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Shailendra Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.
(Crl. Misc. Application for Condonation of Delay/I.A. No.2 of 2025)
Issue notice to the opposite party Nos.2 and 3 returnable at an early date. Steps to be taken within seven working days.
List this case on 15.09.2025.
It is made clear that mere pendency of this revision shall not be treated to be an interim protection to the revisionist and it is open for the trial court to proceed with the case as per law.
Order Date :- 4.8.2025
ML/-
Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Gangaram
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.
Saurabh Lavania
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
