Allowed

Faizi Ahmad @ Jaleel Ahmad v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 2 Others

Allahabad HC19 Feb 2025CRLR/1083/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Faizi Ahmad @ Jaleel Ahmad v. State of U.P.; CRIMINAL REVISION No. 1083 of 2024; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench; Karunesh Singh Pawar, J.; quashing of criminal proceedings on amicable settlement/compromise before Mediation and Conciliation Centre (settlement dated 15.01.2025); Section 126(2) Cr.P.C.; maintenance proceedings; Family Court Raebareli; Criminal Misc. Case No.120

What did the court decide?

Quashing of the impugned judgment and order dated 30.08.2024 passed by Additional Principal Judge-II, Family Court, Raebareli in Criminal Misc. Case No.120 of 2020 (Faizi Ahmad vs. Saleha Faruki) unde

Faizi Ahmad @ Jaleel Ahmad Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 2 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:10971

¶2

Court No. - 16

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1083 of 2024

¶4

Revisionist :- Faizi Ahmad @ Jaleel Ahmad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And 2 Others

¶5

Counsel for Revisionist :- Qazi Mohd.Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Mohd Jishan,Sanjeev Verma

¶6

Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned A.G.A. for the State and learned counsel for respondent nos.2 and 3.

¶8

The petition seeks quashing of impugned judgment and order dated 30.08.2024 passed by Additional Principal Judge-II, Family Court, Raebareli in Criminal Misc. Case No.120 of 2020 (Faizi Ahmad vs. Saleha Faruki) under Section 126(2) Cr.P.C.

¶9

Learned counsel for the parties submit that the revisionist and respondent no.2 have amicably settled their dispute before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court on 15.01.2025, the report of mediation centre is on record.

¶10

Learned counsel for respondent no.2 concedes the argument made by learned counsel for the revisionist.

¶11

Learned counsel for the parties submits that in view of the judgments of Hon'ble Apex Court in B. S. Joshi and others versus State of Haryana and another :(2003) 4 SCC 675, Nikhil Merchant versus C.B.I. and another : (2008) 9 SCC 677, Manoj Sharma versus State and others : (2008) 16 SCC 1, Gian Singh versus State of Punjab: (2010) 15 SCC 118 and Narinder Singh and others versus State of Punjab and another: (2014) 6 SCC 466 , the proceedings pending before

¶12

learned trial court are liable to be quashed.

¶13

In view of the fact that the parties have settled their dispute before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court by way of a compromise, the report is on record as well as law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the cases (supra), the present petition is allowed and the criminal proceedings (supra) are hereby quashed.

¶14

Order Date :- 19.2.2025 Saurabh Yadav/-

¶15

Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Faizi Ahmad @ Jaleel Ahmad v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Faizi Ahmad @ Jaleel Ahmad v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ram Sewak Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 2 Others

Jai Bajrang Traders Ayodhya Thru. Proprietor Manish Kumar Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Amit Kumar Verma and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. and 2 Others

Mohd. Khalid Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Satish Jaiswal Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Vivek Kumar Pandey @ Vivek Pandey Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.