Dismissed¶14

Rupesh Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Affairs and Others

Allahabad HC18 Nov 2025CRLP/9809/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Misc. Writ Petition 9809 of 2024; Rupesh Yadav v. State of U.P.; Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench; maintainability of writ petition; Sections altered during investigation; no prayer for altered Sections; petition dismissed; instructions dated 10.2.2025; Sub-Inspector Sarita; P.S. Chinhat, District Lucknow; learned AGA; none for petitioner; Rajnish Kumar J.; Zafeer Ahmad J.; November 18, 2025.

What did the court decide?

The Court dismissed the petition as not maintainable, adopting the State's submission that although Sections were altered during investigation, the petitioner made no prayer for the altered Sections. ¶14

Rupesh Yadav Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Affairs and Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9809 of 2024

Rupesh Yadav

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Affairs And Others

¶7

Counsel for Petitioner(s) Counsel for Respondent(s) ars n ers	: Akshay Kumar Singh, Palak Jawa : G.A. .....Respondent(s)

¶8

Court No. - 10

¶9

HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J.

¶10

Case called out.

¶11

None for the petitioner to press the petition. There is no request of adjournment or pass over of the case.

¶12

On the first date, the case was adjourned on the request of learned counsel for the petitioner. Thereafter again the case was got adjourned by counsel for the petitioner when it was taken up on 17.1.2025

¶13

Learned AGA on the basis of instructions dated 10.2.2025 received from Ms Sarita, Sub-Inspector, P.S. Chinhat, District Lucknow, a copy of which has been produced before this Court and taken on record, submits that Sections were altered during investigation, however, there is no prayer for altered Sections, therefore, this petition is not maintainable.

¶14

Dismissed accordingly.

¶15

(Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.)

¶16

November 18, 2025

¶17

Fahim/-

¶18

Digitally signed by :- MOHD FAHIM AKHTAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Rupesh Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Affairs and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rupesh Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Affairs and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Anuradha Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and Others

Savnur Khan and 6 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Neekey Lal Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko. and Others

Abhijeet Verma and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home Civil Sectt. Lko and Others

Suresh Bhaskar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. and Others

Smt. Riya Yadav and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and 3 Others