Dismissed¶21

Rambabu Tripathi @ Bablu and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC5 Dec 2025CRLP/8166/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Misc. Writ Petition for quashing of FIR No. 0263/2025 under BNS 2023 dismissed as withdrawn after charge sheet filed; court refuses mini-trial per Muskan v. Ishaan Khan (2025 INSC 1287); liberty to pursue other remedies granted.

What did the court decide?

dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to petitioners to pursue appropriate remedy ¶21

Why is it important?

Rambabu Tripathi @ Bablu and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8166 of 2025

¶3

Rambabu Tripathi @ Bablu And Another

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And 3 Others

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Apoorv Srivastava, Aakash Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.

¶9

Court No. - 11

¶10

HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.

¶11

Heard.

¶12

Instant petition has been filed praying for a quashing of the FIR No. 0263 of 2025, under Sections 108, 115(2), 352 of B.N.S., 2023, Police Station Bilgram, District Hardoi.

¶13

At the very outset, learned AGA on the basis of instructions dated 30.10.2025 sent by Sri Vikas Chaudhary, Sub-Inspector, Police Station Bilgram, District Hardoi, states that a charge sheet dated 19.09.2025 has been submitted before the supervisory authority.

¶14

Learned AGA further points out that the charge sheet has been filed after collecting credible evidence from perusal of which it emerges that prima facie the crime committed by the petitioners/accused is borne out.

¶15

Considering the aforesaid, the Court is not expected to hold a mini trial in order to verify the allegations as levelled in the FIR and the charge sheet vis-a-vis the grounds as taken by the petitioners in the instant petition keeping in view the law laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Muskan vs. Ishaan Khan (Sataniya) and others; 2025 INSC 1287 .

¶16

Even otherwise, having considered the allegations as levelled in the FIR vis-a-vis the grounds taken by the petitioners in the writ petition no

¶17

CRLP No. 8166 of 2025

¶18

¶19

case on merits is made out.

¶20

Upon the same being pointed out, learned counsel for the petitioners states that he does not intend to press the writ petition and prays that the same may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to pursue appropriate remedy as may be available to them.

¶21

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.

¶22

(Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.)

¶23

December 5, 2025

¶24

A. Katiyar

¶25

Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Rambabu Tripathi @ Bablu and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

Rambabu Tripathi @ Bablu and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mashi Ahmed Khan (in Fir Mashi Ahmed) Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Others

Satyakam Pal and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Sandeep Kumar Dubey @ Santosh Dubey Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. and 3 Others

Smt. Sapna Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko and 3 Others

Mohd. Saad Arif Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Others

Navdeep Kumar and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko. and Others