Writ petition sought quashing of FIR under Sections 366, 504, 506 IPC. State reported that charge sheet had been filed and trial was pending; the petition was held to have lost efficacy and was dismissed, with interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 503 of 2024
Mohd. Asgar (In The Fir Asgar Abbas) And Others
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Prin. Secy. Civil Sectt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anjani Kumar Mishra, Harsh Vardhan Kediya, Salik Ram Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Wali Nawaz Khan
Court No. - 10
HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J.
(Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.)
October 16, 2025
Saurabh
Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging FIR under Sections 366, 504, 506 IPC survives after submission of charge sheet in the trial court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohd. Asgar (In The Fir Asgar Abbas)
State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Prin. Secy. Civil Sectt. Lko.
Rajnish Kumar
Zafeer Ahmad
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
