Dismissed

Pavan Kumar and 3 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC11 Dec 2025CRLP/2850/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition sought quashing of FIR No.0482 of 2024 (BNS sections) after a charge sheet had been filed. The court declined to conduct a mini trial, relying on Muskan vs. Ishaan Khan, found no merit, and dismissed the petition with liberty to pursue appropriate remedy.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed; liberty granted to petitioners to pursue appropriate remedy.

Pavan Kumar and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin… — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2850 of 2025

¶3

Pavan Kumar And 3 Others

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Indrajeet, Amit Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.

¶9

Court No. - 11

¶10

HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.

¶11

Case called out. None appears for the petitioners despite a notice having been affixed on the notice board that the matter would be taken at 02.15 PM.

¶12

Instant petition has been filed praying for a quashing of the FIR No.0482 of 2024, under Sections 115 (2), 352 & 351 (3) of B.N.S, 2023, Police Station Asandra, District Barabanki.

¶13

Learned AGA on the basis of instructions sent by Sri Bal Krishna Dwivedi, Sub Inspector, Police Station- Asandra District- Barabanki dated 19.11.2025 states that a charge sheet dated 08.02.2025 has been submitted before the supervisory authority and thereafter in Court on 20.06.2025.

¶14

Learned AGA further points out that the charge sheet has been filed after collecting credible evidence from perusal of which it emerges that prima facie the crime committed by the petitioner/accused is borne out.

¶15

Considering the aforesaid, the Court is not expected to hold a mini trial in order to verify the allegations as levelled in the FIR and the charge sheet vis-a-vis the grounds as taken by the petitioner in the instant petition keeping in view the law laid down by Hon.ble Supreme Court in the case of Muskan vs. Ishaan Khan (Sataniya) and others; 2025 INSC 1287.

¶16

CRLP No. 2850 of 2025

¶17

¶18

Even otherwise, having considered the allegations as levelled in the FIR vis-a-vis the grounds taken by the petitioners in the writ petition no case on merits is made out.

¶19

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to pursue appropriate remedy.

¶20

(Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.)

¶21

December 11, 2025

¶22

Pachhere/-

¶23

Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Pavan Kumar and 3 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pavan Kumar and 3 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mohd. Junaid Siddiqui Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Haseena Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home U.P. Sectt. Lko. and Others

Chandan Pathak Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Others

Jyoti and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Naveen Babbar @ Gama Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Others

Smt. Geeta and Another Vs State of U.P. through Principal Secretary, Home, Lucknow and 3 Others