Writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR under Section 135 of the Electricity Act and protection from arrest. Court disposed of it by directing that if the petitioner applies for compounding within one month, she shall not be arrested for six months or until conclusion of compounding proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:18916-DB
Court No. - 47
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2356 of 2025
Petitioner :- Smt. Shama Parveen Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Krishna Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Mukesh Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Siddharth,J. Hon'ble Praveen Kumar Giri,J.
Order Date :- 10.2.2025 VKG
Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be protected from arrest for the Section 135 Electricity Act offence given it is compoundable?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt. Shama Parveen
State Of U.P.
Siddharth
Praveen Kumar Giri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
