The High Court disposed of a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR. The order directs that the petitioners not be arrested pending cognizance on the police report, following a previous judgment.
Not to arrest petitioners until cognizance is taken on the police report under Section 193(3) B.N.S.S.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:18077-DB
Court No. - 47
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2266 of 2025
Petitioner :- Madan And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anoop Tiwari,Pavan Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J. Hon'ble Praveen Kumar Giri,J.
Order Date :- 7.2.2025 SS
Digitally signed by :- SURENDER SINGH NARANG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking quashing of the FIR should be disposed of based on a synchronized order.
Madan And 4 Others
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Siddharth
Praveen Kumar Giri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
