The petitioners sought a writ restraining authorities from disturbing their married life or harassing them. The Advocate General for the State submitted that no FIR had been lodged and no harassment was occurring. The court found the petition to be misconceived and baseless.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2288 of 2024
Smt. Laxmi Devi And Another
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Others
.....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sri Niwas Jaiswal Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Ashish Raman Mishra
Court No. - 10
HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J.
"i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the opposite parties no.1 to 3 to restrain the opp. party No.4 & 5 not to disturb the peaceful married life of the petitioners & not to harass the petitioners."
(Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.)
October 31, 2025
Saurabh
Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Smt. Laxmi Devi
Another
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Others
Rajnish Kumar
Zafeer Ahmad
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
