Writ petition sought quashing of an FIR under Sections 306/504 IPC. The State reported that a final report had already been filed in the trial court, rendering the petition infructuous. The court dismissed the petition as having lost its efficacy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1044 of 2024
Rukmani Devi Alias Khusboo Mishra
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vina Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 10
HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J.
"Today, again adjournment has been sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner. List again.
It is made clear that pendency of this writ petition shall not be a ground for installing the investigation in abeyance. "
(Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.)
October 31, 2025 Akanksha Sri/-
Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging FIR No.0673/2023 survives after filing of the final report in the case.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rukmani Devi Alias Khusboo Mishra
State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko.
Rajnish Kumar
Zafeer Ahmad
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
