Ramesh Kumar Yadav and 2 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Allahabad HC (Lucknow Bench), CRL.MISC. WRIT PETITION 10068 of 2024; petitioner Ramesh Kumar Yadav +2 (counsel Balak Ram) v. State of U.P. +another (G.A./A.G.A.); order dated 10.4.2025 by Rajnish Kumar, J.; petition dismissed as not pressed at counsel's request without objection from the other side; A.G.A.'s observation recorded that an application under Section 321 Cr.P.C. could not have been moved by the accused/petitioners (not adjudicated); prior order dated 03.01.2021 had fixed 27.01.2025 hearing on maintainability of prayer no.1, issued notice to opposite party no.2, and clarified that pendency of the writ petition created no stay of proceedings pending before the trial court.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was dismissed as not pressed, counsel for the petitioners having sought its withdrawal and the other side raising no objection; the maintainability question previously fixed for 27.01.2025 was thereby not adjudicated.