Criminal appeal against refusal under the SC/ST Act; appellant sought dismissal as not pressed with liberty to seek bail per Satender Kumar Antil. Court refused quashing but directed expeditious bail decision if appellant appears within 14 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:23183
Court No. - 12
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1237 of 2025
Appellant :- Karan Pal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Ashish Jaiswal,Surendra Pal Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
5.The appeal is disposed of accordingly.
(Alok Mathur, J.)
Order Date :- 23.4.2025 RKM.
Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherRelied on
Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of 2021
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Karan Pal
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
Another
Alok Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
