Appeal under Section 14A(1) SC/ST Act challenging rejection of a Section 156(3) complaint alleging fraudulent sale of the appellant's land and caste abuse. The High Court held it a civil dispute already pending in suit, with no evidence of caste-related utterances, and dismissed the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:22698
Court No. - 12
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1097 of 2025
Appellant :- Smt. Dhanpata Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home U.P. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Nitin Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
declaration/decree from the competent court of civil jurisdiction while with regard to the second agreement it seems that she is claiming that the said agreement was forged which allegation has been made to put undue pressure on the respondent. These are the facts which can adequate be considered and decided by the civil court.
(Alok Mathur, J.)
Order Date :- 22.4.2025 RKM.
Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Special Judge rightly rejected the complaint under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. on the ground that the dispute was civil in nature.
Whether the allegations of caste-related abuse disclosed any offence without the words being stated or evidence adduced.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt. Dhanpata
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home U.P. Lko.
Respondent Nos. 2 to 4
Alok Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
